← back to picks
Founded 1951, Neutraubling · IPO 1984EUR reportingSynthetic credit Aaa/AAAValuation 2026-05-24FCFF DCFv3 · Dark

Deeply undervalued · +41.8% margin of safety

Market outside MC distribution

Market €117.80 vs DCF €202.54 (post-governance). Even at the 5th-percentile Monte Carlo outcome (€163.24), intrinsic value exceeds today's price by 38%.

p5 163 p25 183 p75 218 p95 245 DCF €202.54 MARKET €117.80 €110 €255 UNDERVALUED FAIR VALUE BAND
Sector Industrial Machinery — Beverage PackagingCountry mix 🇺🇸 18% · 🇫🇷 13% · 🇩🇪 9%β 0.95 (5Y regression)MC σ ±€24.72Governance 5% haircut
Intrinsic / share
€202.54
post 5% gov
Market / share
€117.80
last close
Margin of safety
+41.8%
vs intrinsic
Enterprise value
€6.33B
69% terminal
Cost of equity / debt
8.12 / 1.96%
β 0.95 · CRP 1.79%
Stable ROIC / g
15.0 / 2.4%
spread ~712bp

What it sells, where it sells

Operating segments — FY25 revenue €5.66B

FY25 €5.66B
Filling & PackagingCore beverage lines · cyclical capex-driven~62%
Lifecycle ServiceAftermarket · margin-accretive, recurring~22%
Process TechnologyProcess tech for brewing & dairy plants~10%
IntralogisticsInternal logistics / warehouse~6%

Filling & Packaging is the volume; Lifecycle Service is the margin lever (recurring spares + Ingeniq subscriptions earn ~15-18% EBIT vs ~5-6% on new machines). Modeled as one consolidated segment.

Country mix (revenue-weighted)

🇺🇸United States18.0%
🇫🇷France13.0%
🇩🇪Germany9.0%
🇨🇳China8.0%
🇮🇹Italy7.0%
🇵🇱Poland7.0%
🇻🇳Vietnam7.0%
🇸🇦Saudi Arabia6.0%
🌍Other (6)25.0%

~38% of revenue sits in emerging markets (MEA, LatAm, EM-APAC, Eastern Europe) — meaningfully higher EM exposure than European consumer peers, and the reason the cost-of-capital build carries a 1.8% country-risk premium.

Background — five things to know before the case

Context the share price doesn't carry on its face. Skim this once and the claims below read as evidence, not inside baseball.

Where we diverge from the sector

Each row asks: if we'd used the sector median for this one assumption instead of our override, how much would the per-share value change? Negative = our override is more conservative (worth less); positive = more aggressive (worth more). Skim down the rightmost column to see which bets are doing the work.

Assumption
Our input
Sector median
Value impact
01 Revenue growth Year-1 rate, fading to terminal
4.0% Y1 → 2.4% FY26 guide midpoint + structural fade
~5% Machinery industry standard
−€11
02 Operating margin Target in Year 10
8.0% by Y10 7.36% today + services-mix shift
~15.9% Machinery industry standard
−€95
03 Sales-to-capital Reinvestment efficiency
3.0 Capital-light assembly + service
~1.95 US Machinery standard
+€22
04 Terminal growth Year 10+ steady state
2.4% EUR risk-free ceiling
2.4% at the ceiling — no override
€0
05 Cost of capital WACC, 10-year average
7.88% β 0.95 (5Y regression, multi-source)
~10.30% if we'd kept Damodaran global Machinery β 1.37
+€33
Net effect of overrides
Overrides net −€51/share vs all-defaults · we are materially more conservative on margin (8% vs 16% sector) and growth, partly offset by capital-efficiency credit and a regression-derived β (0.95) that prices KRN's near-zero leverage and lower realized volatility better than the global Machinery sector default. Even this stack lands at €203 vs €118 market.
−€51
Our override Sector median Override adds value Override subtracts value

The story & the five claims

The 10-year story this DCF is built on, plus the five anchor claims that translate the story into DCF inputs.

The 10-year story

Krones is a 75-year-old German Mittelstand world-leader in beverage filling and packaging machinery — turnkey PET, glass, and can lines for global brewers and bottlers, with ~91% of revenue exported. The base case is not a re-rating story. It's a mature specialty-machinery franchise grinding revenue forward at ~4% Y1 declining to 2.4% terminal, while EBIT margin walks from 7.36% today to 8% by Y10 as the Lifecycle Service + Ingeniq subscription mix grows from ~30% toward ~40% of revenue. Capital stays light (sales-to-capital ~3.0). The €548M net cash and zero financial debt underwrite the option value of disciplined bolt-on M&A (Netstal 2024, Ampco 2023) and absorb the inevitable capex-cycle slowdowns. The market is reading event-driven Q1 EPS softness (−9.6%, mostly FX translation and the Ingeniq transition's flagged 100bp drag through 2027) as if it were structural damage. It isn't.

Two debates worth pressure-testing

Cyclical peak or structural growth?
Our view: FY25 +7.0% was likely peak; FY26 guide +3-5% points to a structural component (rPET retool cycle + EM share gain), not pure cycle rollover. We model 4% Y1 → 2.4% terminal as the middle path.
Commoditization clock vs services annuity?
Our view: The bear deep-dive ("Family Control, Zero Debt, and the Commoditisation Clock") is real over a 10-year window — Chinese competitors will close on lower-end PET. But the 5-year services-mix transition runs faster than the commoditization curve, and ROCE expanded 10% → 19% over the last five years through that pressure.
CLAIM 01 Revenue grows 4% → 2.4% over 10 years. FY26 guide 3-5%, fade to EUR rf Beverage volume ~2% + EM share gain + rPET retool cycle. Half a turn above structural beverage growth — fully consistent with the last-decade trajectory through two cycles.
CLAIM 02 EBIT margin walks from 7.36% to 8% by Y10. services mix 30% → 40% Services / Ingeniq earn ~15-18% EBIT vs ~5-6% on new machines. Mix-shift drags the blended margin up by ~65bp over 10 years — slow grind, not step-change.
CLAIM 03 Sales-to-capital stays at 3.0. capital-light assembly Mostly assembly + integration of bought-in components, plus a service business that earns revenue against zero incremental capital. Realized ratio sits in the 2.5-3.3 bracket; 3.0 is conservative-middle.
CLAIM 04 Convergence by year 10. slow services-mix transition Margin and growth both converge gradually to steady-state by Y10. Ingeniq subscription rollout is a 100bp drag through 2027 before flipping to tailwind.
CLAIM 05 Terminal growth 2.4%, ROIC 15%, no failure risk. EUR rf ceiling · 5% gov haircut Terminal g pinned at EUR risk-free. ROIC 15% (below cycle peak 19% but well above WACC). Failure probability zero — net cash, zero debt. 5% governance haircut for the controlling family, anchored on 75 years of pro-minority track record.
Where we diverge from sell-side
  • WACC corrected via β triangulation. Earlier pass used Damodaran's US Machinery subset (β_u 0.89, β_lev 0.92), giving WACC 7.70%. A correction to global Machinery (β_u 1.33, β_lev 1.37) gave WACC 10.30%, but the multi-source 5Y regression β for KRN is 0.95 (Yahoo, StockAnalysis, SimplyWallSt all agree). With KRN at near-zero D/E (€5M total debt vs €3.7B market cap), regression β ≈ unlevered β. The 44% gap between regression and Damodaran-global triggers our triangulation rule → trust regression. Final: β 0.95, Ke 8.12%, WACC 7.88%, MoS +41.8%.
  • Margin target stays sub-sector. We hold 8% Y10 EBIT vs the Machinery industry standard ~16% — Krones is equipment-heavy, not pure-play service/software, so the industry median doesn't fit.
  • Capital-light credit honored. Sales-to-capital 3.0, well above the Machinery 1.95 standard, but consistent with Krones' realized 2.5-3.3 bracket and ROCE-expansion trail.
  • Governance haircut only 5%. The controlling Kronseder pool would normally earn 15-25%; we anchor at 5% on the 75-year track record + net-buying family vehicle. Skeptical readers can bump it to 15% and still see ~+22% MoS.
  • FY26 guide-anchored, not FY25 peak. Sell-side consensus still drags toward the FY25 €417M EBIT peak; we anchor to the guided FY26 walk and the realized FY26 cc growth trajectory.
Bear anchors
  • PET → aluminum transition stalls. If consumer or regulatory pressure on aluminum eases, the line-conversion replacement-cycle thesis softens; growth drops to 2-3% over the explicit period.
  • Emerging-market FX drag persists. ~30% of revenue is Mexico / India / MEA-exposed; sustained EM FX weakness compresses EUR translation (already visible in Q1 2026 −2.2% reported vs +1.4% cc).
  • Beverage capex pauses 2027+. Backlog burns down, Y3-5 revenue disappoints. Mitigated by €548M net cash absorbing any single-cycle slowdown without forcing capital choices.
  • Chinese competitor commoditization. Substack bear thesis: lower-end PET/can lines compress margin back to 6-7% by Y10; service annuity cannibalized by 3rd-party retrofits.
  • Family-control governance optics. 2023 DAX-family removal over C.10 committee form is real; the 5% haircut prices the form gap, but a regulator-driven re-rating could widen it.

Risks to thesis

PET → aluminum transition stallsMed

If consumer or regulatory pressure on aluminum eases, the line-conversion replacement-cycle thesis softens; growth drops to 2-3% explicit period.

Emerging market FXMed

~30% revenue from Mexico/India/MEA; sustained EM FX weakness compresses EUR translation (already visible in Q1 2026 -2.2% reported vs +1.4% cc).

Cyclical machinery downturnMed

If beverage capex pauses 2027+, backlog burns down and Y3-5 growth disappoints. Mitigated by €548M net cash absorbing any single-cycle slowdown.

Commoditization by Chinese competitorsMed

Substack bear thesis: lower-end PET/can lines compress margin back to 6-7% by Y10; service annuity cannibalized by 3rd-party retrofits.

Kronseder family 51.9% controlLow

75-year pro-minority track record; 2023 DAX-family removal over C.10 committee form is governance optics, not value extraction. Priced via 0.05 haircut.

Customer concentrationLow

Top 10 customers ~40% revenue, spread across Coca-Cola / Pepsi / AB InBev / Heineken bottlers — diversified by geography and product line.

10-year forecast

Revenue + FCFF on the left axis; operating margin on the right axis.

€0M €2.12B €4.25B €6.38B €8.50B REVENUE / FCFF (EUR) 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% OP MARGIN (%) Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10 Revenue (L) FCFF (L) Op margin (R)

Monte Carlo distribution

p5 p25 p50 p75 p95 market 117.80 111.6 198.8 279.1 freq equity / share (EUR)

Even at the 5th-percentile outcome (€163.24), intrinsic value still exceeds today's €117.80 price by 38% — the disagreement isn't whether Krones is undervalued, but by how much.

Mean €201.27 ± €24.72 across 1000 iterations (0 failed) · P(intrinsic < market €117.80) = 0.0%.

⚠ Active diagnostic:
Cost of capital build
Risk-free rate ~2.40% implied from CE − β·(ERP+CRP)
Mature-market ERP (assumed) 4.23% 2026 global mature-market ERP
Levered β 0.9500 5Y regression (Yahoo/StockAnalysis/SimplyWallSt triangulated)
Weighted CRP 1.79% country mix × per-country
Cost of equity 8.12%
Pre-tax cost of debt 1.96% synth rating Aaa/AAA
WACC 7.88%
Terminal growth 2.40%
Terminal ROIC 15.00%
Full year-by-year DCF
Year Revenue Op mgn EBIT EBIT(1−t) Reinvest FCFF PV
1 €5.89B 7.4% €437M €311M €76M €235M €218M
2 €6.13B 7.5% €459M €326M €79M €247M €212M
3 €6.37B 7.6% €481M €342M €82M €260M €207M
4 €6.63B 7.6% €505M €358M €85M €273M €202M
5 €6.89B 7.7% €529M €376M €88M €287M €197M
6 €7.17B 7.7% €555M €393M €92M €301M €191M
7 €7.45B 7.8% €582M €411M €96M €315M €185M
8 €7.75B 7.9% €610M €430M €99M €330M €180M
9 €8.06B 7.9% €640M €449M €103M €346M €175M
10 €8.38B 8.0% €671M €470M €107M €362M €170M
Methodology & flags

FCFF DCF, 10y explicit + perpetuity. R&D capitalisation: OFF · Lease capitalisation: OFF · Failure-rate adjustment: OFF · ESO subtraction: OFF.